Before I move on here are the links to various debunkings of the "Christ myth" Here is a great look at the ridiculous claims of most of the authors on that list (how they get away with this stuff is beyond rational thought)This movie also tries to make the claim that the Catholic churches pagan ideals, symbolism ,and rituals are somehow proof that Christianity itself is a part of this, nothing could be further from the truth.

Lets take December 25th mentioned at least a dozen times in the film. The date of December 25th, which was officially proclaimed by the church fathers in A.D. 440, was actually a vestige of the Roman holiday of Saturnalia, observed near the winter solstice, which itself was among the many pagan traditions inherited from the earlier Babylonian priesthood. Any person that doesn't drool on themselves will tell you that nowhere in the bible is this date mentioned or inferred in ANY way.

It is ludicrous to say that and pagan rituals involving this date can be linked to Christianity before the catholic church got a hold of the idea, that is, ALMOST 500 YEARS LATER. This illustrates that the Vatican has very little to do with true Christianity except for the obvious problem that they themselves always claim that they ARE Christianity.

His sources exposed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdrnEo_2QW8 must see. Zeitgeist the new "truth" movie being promoted by its makers on conspiracy message boards around the internet has been thoroughly debunked. It is disgusting to think the makers would try to sell it as a "truth movie" considering that it has dozens (over 50) easily provable factual errors.

This is a slap in the face to the people who have died and will continue to do so in this patriot movement, we would expect nothing less than 100% accuracy of any movie in the 911 truth realm. We are talking about specific false claims that have been debunked for years, yet because this is the first time its been put into a form of a movie It has new life.

This is not about a defense of a religion, it is about the integrity of information and our right not to be lied to by people claiming to be "truthers". You will notice that they don't site one single original source for the Jesus similarities they claim exist, you would think if it was true that the ancient texts showed such similarities, they would simply site these ancient texts. They don't because they do not exist.

Its quite simple, They instead offer books from authors such as Tim Leedom, Massey, Acharya, Doherty. This is laughable as a resource list if you have looked in to these claims. It's the equivalent as me referencing Glenn Beck to prove there is no 911 conspiracy. I know its hard to believe that Tsarion or Alan Watt have been quoting known disinfo in their dissemination of this idea, but look for yourself, The numerous claims made by this movie concerning Jesus's many similarities are either true or false.

Before I move on here are the links to various debunkings of the "Christ myth" Here is a great look at the ridiculous claims of most of the authors on that list (how they get away with this stuff is beyond rational thought)This movie also tries to make the claim that the Catholic churches pagan ideals, symbolism ,and rituals are somehow proof that Christianity itself is a part of this, nothing could be further from the truth.

Lets take December 25th mentioned at least a dozen times in the film. The date of December 25th, which was officially proclaimed by the church fathers in A.D. 440, was actually a vestige of the Roman holiday of Saturnalia, observed near the winter solstice, which itself was among the many pagan traditions inherited from the earlier Babylonian priesthood. Any person that doesn't drool on themselves will tell you that nowhere in the bible is this date mentioned or inferred in ANY way.

It is ludicrous to say that and pagan rituals involving this date can be linked to Christianity before the catholic church got a hold of the idea, that is, ALMOST 500 YEARS LATER. This illustrates that the Vatican has very little to do with true Christianity except for the obvious problem that they themselves always claim that they ARE Christianity.

A torment against the atheistic propaganda... Sources used: Horus-Encyclopedia Britannica Attis-Jean Richepin Nouvelle Mythologie Illustree(1921), Pausanias Greece, 7.19(200 A.D) Dionysus-Theogony of Hesiod(700BC), Jean Richepin Nouvelle Mythologie Illustree(1921) Krishna-Encyclopedia Britannica, Mahabharata (500 BC) Mithra-Encyclopedia Britannica, Encyclopedia Iranica Three Kings-Lettres de Mon Moulin (1866), Gospel of Matthew 2:1-12 aeon-Matthew 28:20(Greek Gospel) Miracle birth-wikipedia on Luxor Temple Moses-Old Testament:Exodus Sargon-King 1907: 87--96, based on a neo-assyrian text from 700bc, Summerian King List (2125 B.C) Joseph & Jesus-Genesis:37-45, Gospel of Matthew 26:15 Justin Martyr-Justin Martyr's Apology Ch.XXI

Next time before you arrogantly dare to ask me what my sources are, ASK ABOUT ZEITGEIST'S SOURCES! When someone is claiming that Horus, Krishna, Attis etc were similar to Jesus, HE MUST BRING SOURCES FROM ANTIQUITY THAT MENTION THESE CHARACTERISTICS!If he doesn't, then he is a LIAR!

Even secular scholars have rejected the idea of Christianity borrowing from the ancient mysteries. The well-respected Sir Edward Evans-Pritchard writes in Theories of Primitive Religion that "The evidence for this theory is negligible."

The first real parallel of a dying and rising god does not appear until A.D. 150, more than a hundred years after the origin of Christianity. So if there was any influence of one on the other, it was the influence of the historical event of the New Testament [resurrection] on mythology, not the reverse. The only known account of a god surviving death that predates Christianity is the Egyptian cult god Osiris.

In this myth, Osiris is cut into fourteen pieces, scattered around Egypt, then reassembled and brought back to life by the goddess Isis. However, Osiris does not actually come back to physical life but becomes a member of a shadowy underworld...This is far different than Jesus’ resurrection account where he was the gloriously risen Prince of life who was seen by others on earth before his ascension into heaven." --Dr. Norman Geisler

"Not one clear case of any alleged resurrection teaching appears in any pagan text before the late second century A.D., almost one hundred years after the New Testament was written." --Dr. Gary Habermas This film refutes the following claims made in the film Zeitgeist: -Christianity was borrowed from pagan myths? -The Bible was plagiarized? -Jesus wasn't a historical figure? -Christianity was created for social control? -The Bible is based on astrology? MORE INFO VISIT: www.beitshalomministries.org