After all, if he exists, it MUST be provable!

All I'm saying is that NOT EVERYONE will be satisfied with ANY proof you raise.

ALSO, thousands of valuable documents were burned by the Vatican in the inquisition.

I challenge YOU to PROVE that "God" or "Gods" don't exist!
Only an imbecile would ask for proof of something that cannot be proven simply due to the very apparent FACT that human beings have VERY LIMITED capabilities of perception. Even our technology only allows us to extend our perception further, but the limits themselves never change. We still see, smell, feel, and hear things in the same limited ways.
"God" or "Gods" as "supreme creative sources" are so far beyond the limits of human perception that they can never be proven or disproven - PERIOD!
All religions are man-made attempts to explain the unexplainable and make it conform to the severe limits of human perception. All sciences proceed from and are confined by, the severe limits of human perception. Therefore, it is INSANE to try to employ either religious mythology OR any of the sciences to try and "prove" or "disprove" a God or any Gods. Such beings are simply and clearly BEYOND the capacity of man to understand, properly comprehend, or ever prove or disprove. And only idiots waste their time trying to take a pro or con position and then argue about it.

"And only idiots waste their time trying to take a pro or con position and then argue about it. " Well looks like you just called yourself an idiot. Good work Detective Dip Shit!

lucky13970 is obviously an imbecile of the "Acharya S." variety - an imbecile who simply CANNOT offer anything concrete in terms of a rebuttal or in terms of a statement that even remotely contains sense and reason. In other words, lucky is a typical example of the rabble around today - the mindless, unthinking, logic-less pack of two-legged creatures who amount to nothing except moving props on the stage of life.
Notice the specifics contained within this particula post old Lucky has offered. This cretin suggests that I've taken a pro or con stance concerning the possible proof that "God" or "Gods" exist. All one needs to do is to read my original post to be able to see that lucky is utterly unable to comprehend what he/she is reading...nevermind being able to offer any sort of statement(s) for or against what he/she reads.
This is a prefect example of one of those people who should not exist at all - a human-ish "thing" who is good for nothing except eating, sleeping, urinating, defecating, and copulating. These basic functions are the maximum for the likes of the Lucky 13970's of the world. Unfortunately, these degenerates have a real knack for finding their way onto forums and message boards, and once there they try to make themselves seem important by relentlessly posting pointless comments and statements.

"lucky is a typical example of the rabble around today - the mindless, unthinking, logic-less pack of two-legged creatures who amount to nothing except moving props on the stage of life." For someone who is such an "imbecile" you sure seem to take offense to my comments. Unless there is really something to be said I'd walk away from any stupid person, you apparently don't and that’s _base_d upon your own accusations. To conclude this thought, this makes you someone who wastes their own time arguing with an idiot. Now who is stupid?
As for, “This is a prefect example of one of those people who should not exist at all - a human-ish "thing" who is good for nothing except eating, sleeping, urinating, defecating, and copulating.” Thank you for describing what every fucking human does on the planet to survive and keep their traditions going. A REAL EYE OPENER YOU ARE!!! Anyways, instead of responding and contradicting your lack of logic more I’d rather leave you to being somehow insulted by a casual and progressive thinking “imbecile” human being.


P.S. Suck it Trebek!

More imbecility, lucky!

"God" or "Gods" ( as they are defined within the various mythologies of the world's cultures ) cannot EVER be proven or disproven to "exist". Therefore, I SAID IT WAS ABSURD AND STUPID TO ASK FOR PROOF OF THEM IN A POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE WAY. GET IT, LUCKY?
It is obvious to anyone who read my post in this thread that I wasn't taking a believer's or disbeliever's stance about "God" or "Gods". But what is obvious to others goes right over your head.
In other words, if a point is not explained in detail and repeatedly, you simply cannot seem to grasp it, and worse; you usually interpret it from a completely disconnected slant.
My original post does not amount to "arguing with an idiot", it amounts to alerting the idiot to their idiocy. It also amounts to letting other readers know just why the idiot is an idiot. But once again, this entirely escapes you.